The Duck That Won the Lottery: 100 New Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher

By Julian Baggini

From the writer of the "hugely entertaining"(Publishers Weekly) The Pig that desires to Be Eaten, classes in debunking the defective arguments we pay attention each day

This most up-to-date ebook from the pop philosophy writer of The Pig that wishes to Be Eaten tackles an forever attention-grabbing sector of renowned debate-the defective argument. Julian Baggini offers a rapid-fire number of brief, stimulating, and wonderful charges from a variety of well-known humans in politics, the media, and leisure, together with Donald Rumsfeld, Emma Thompson, Tony Blair, invoice Clinton, and Chris Martin. every one access takes as its start line an instance of hugely questionable-though oddly persuasive-reasoning from a wide number of topics. As Baggini teases out the common sense within the illogical, armchair philosophers and aficionados of the absurd will locate themselves nodding their heads as they giggle out loud. The Duck That gained the Lottery is ideal fodder for any cocktail get together and natural excitement for somebody who loves an outstanding mind tornado.

Show description

Quick preview of The Duck That Won the Lottery: 100 New Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher PDF

Best Philosophy books

A Brief History of Thought: A Philosophical Guide to Living (Learning to Live)

French big name thinker Luc Ferry encapsulates an enlightening treatise of pop-philosophy in a full of life narrative of Western thought—explaining how the historical past of philosophy can educate us how you can stay greater lives at the present time. This blockbuster greater dwelling consultant has already bought approximately a part 1000000 copies in Europe; now it really is to be had all over the world in an exhilarating, hugely readable translation: a quick heritage of proposal.

Actual Consciousness

What's it that you can be awake? there is not any contract no matter what in philosophy or technological know-how: it has remained a difficult challenge, a secret. is that this in part or as a rule owed to the present theories no longer even having an analogous topic, no longer answering an identical query? In real cognizance, Ted Honderich units out to supersede dualisms, goal physicalisms, summary functionalism, common externalisms, and different positions within the debate.

Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Biology (Oxford Aristotle Studies Series)

This quantity provides an interconnected set of 16 essays, 4 of that are formerly unpublished, by means of Allan Gotthelf--one of the top specialists within the research of Aristotle's organic writings. Gotthelf addresses 3 major issues throughout Aristotle's 3 major organic treatises. beginning together with his personal ground-breaking research of Aristotle's typical teleology and its illuminating courting with the new release of Animals, Gotthelf proceeds to the axiomatic constitution of organic clarification (and the 1st ideas such rationalization proceeds from) within the components of Animals.

Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants

There were impressive advancements within the box of human rights some time past few a long time. nonetheless, thousands of asylum-seekers, refugees, and undocumented immigrants proceed to discover it not easy to entry human rights. during this publication, Ayten Gündogdu builds on Hannah Arendt's research of statelessness and argues that those demanding situations exhibit the perplexities of human rights.

Extra info for The Duck That Won the Lottery: 100 New Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher

Show sample text content

I feel it has. There are numerous examples of the place our unreflective, intuitive responses get it correct faster or extra competently than our extra systematic deliberations. good judgment may also include a type of collective knowledge, principles of thumb that sometimes paintings and are justified through the tribunal of historical past, now not rational argument. the difficulty is that it's not easy to tell apart this completely sturdy number of good judgment from broadly accredited falsehoods. good judgment will be doubtful, yet gratuitously denying it's a reasonable manner of sounding highbrow.

How else do you clarify the evil on this planet? Reverend Billy Graham104 Is a nasty clarification greater than no clarification in any respect? in the event that your espresso cup unexpectedly shatters for no obvious cause, and anyone indicates it spontaneously received awareness, learned the futility of its life, and dedicated suicide, wouldn't it be clever to just accept that rationalization, provisionally at the least, until eventually a greater one was once imminent? basically there are a few reasons which are worse than no motives in any respect. but people don’t look cozy dwelling with the unaccountable.

Certain, draw the road at slaves, but if it involves the likes of intercourse employees, those who paintings in sweatshops, infantrymen who get shot, or the folk who've to scrub the bathrooms you employ, you could consistently inform your self: they didn’t need to do it—it used to be their selection. the foremost thought here's “informed consent. ” If an individual is tricked into prostitution, or advised they will be paid good and really given a pittance, that’s something. but when they tackle a task within the complete wisdom of what they're stepping into, regardless of how risky or disagreeable it's, shouldn’t we simply think they're creating a rational selection for themselves and never be anxious over their plight?

It may be a invaluable workout to behavior an audit of our ordinary assets of knowledge and fee even if we apportion them the suitable point of belief. Which assets can we belief too quite simply, and which will we brush aside too quick? think an individual staring at you from the outside:would they regard your personal reflex responses to the credibility of knowledge assets as being naïve or prejudiced? See additionally 27. Guilt by means of organization 36. clarification isn't really justification sixty five. reason isn't accountability 88. Fallacy of old knowledge 29.

Does that suggest we should always be cautious approximately consuming it since it wasn’t intended for consuming? What approximately honey, one other favourite of overall healthiness meals retailers? That used to be “meant” for bees no longer people. As for eggs, good, they have been “meant” to be child animals, now not omelettes. whether we enable ourselves to speak loosely approximately what issues in nature are “meant” for, it may be visible that this doesn't inform the entire tale approximately what they are often used for. the purpose is straightforward and noticeable: the truth that anything didn't evolve as a human nutrients doesn't suggest we shouldn’t consume it.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.25 of 5 – based on 9 votes